This inconsistency reveals something crucial about drug policy: the psychosis argument was never about protecting vulnerable people. It was about justifying prohibition of a substance that threatened certain interests. Because if we genuinely cared about preventing psychosis, we’d be banning social media, AI chatbots, and countless other triggers before we’d prohibit a plant humans have used for thousands of years.
When I first started writing this, I thought it would be a quick explainer of…
Grenada’s reform is building regional momentum, but Bermuda’s path runs straight into a UK veto,…
The hemp boom moved fast. In the years following the 2018 Farm Bill, thousands of…
Flowers & Terps and Universal Growing are joining forces in a move that blends flower…
Rolling papers aren’t props. They’re the instrument that sets the pace and feel of a…
Yesterday, Colombian President Gustavo Petro appeared before the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs, where he…