This inconsistency reveals something crucial about drug policy: the psychosis argument was never about protecting vulnerable people. It was about justifying prohibition of a substance that threatened certain interests. Because if we genuinely cared about preventing psychosis, we’d be banning social media, AI chatbots, and countless other triggers before we’d prohibit a plant humans have used for thousands of years.
Twenty years after Harold & Kumar, the actor talks to High Times about meeting Cheech…
Fat Nugs Magazine’s Kids and Cannabis issue tackled a tough but necessary conversation. A partner…
On April 23, 2026, the Trump administration moved medical marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule…
The Acting Attorney General is getting the ball rolling on the rescheduling of cannabis from…
Based on the researchers’ findings, individuals who consumed cannabis drinks reduced alcohol intake by nearly…
Legal on paper, restricted in practice. Inside Germany’s cannabis system, where cultivation is allowed but…