This inconsistency reveals something crucial about drug policy: the psychosis argument was never about protecting vulnerable people. It was about justifying prohibition of a substance that threatened certain interests. Because if we genuinely cared about preventing psychosis, we’d be banning social media, AI chatbots, and countless other triggers before we’d prohibit a plant humans have used for thousands of years.
Ecuador’s hemp sector is projected to approach or surpass $20 million in 2026 as companies…
The traditional off-ramps, pensions, savings, Social Security that actually covers your bills, family structures that…
Let me put it another way: the United States government spent more than fifty years…
New Jersey’s THC beverage market is heading into the most consequential stretch of its short…
Mormon Wives star Mikayla Matthews says medical cannabis was “literally life-changing” for her nerve pain…
Chains reorder every two weeks and earn twice the discounts. Independents stock the same breadth…