This inconsistency reveals something crucial about drug policy: the psychosis argument was never about protecting vulnerable people. It was about justifying prohibition of a substance that threatened certain interests. Because if we genuinely cared about preventing psychosis, we’d be banning social media, AI chatbots, and countless other triggers before we’d prohibit a plant humans have used for thousands of years.
A new collaboration brings together iconic functional glass, carefully selected cannabis genetics and a mission…
This interview by Micah Johnson originally appeared in High Times Local, produced under license by…
Congress's watchdog confirmed the DEA has no complete written procedures for drug scheduling. Learn why…
This column originally appeared in Cultivated, a cannabis industry newsletter. Subscribe here. You know the…
The DEA has opened a new registration process for state-licensed medical cannabis manufacturers, distributors and…
This November gathering will bring psychedelic education into conversation with music, visual art, comedy, philosophy,…