This inconsistency reveals something crucial about drug policy: the psychosis argument was never about protecting vulnerable people. It was about justifying prohibition of a substance that threatened certain interests. Because if we genuinely cared about preventing psychosis, we’d be banning social media, AI chatbots, and countless other triggers before we’d prohibit a plant humans have used for thousands of years.
Slapwoods is announcing its first-ever official collaboration with DJ Screw, the late Houston legend whose…
It could be so easy to believe that cannabis culture is something that has been…
Modern cultivation techniques and spiritual practices collide with Pink Boost Goddess on our next Legendary…
Animal rescuers and advocacy groups say dogs living on Skid Row are suffering from neglect,…
This article originally appeared in High Times’ 50th Anniversary print issue. It is an excerpt…
How Montana built a legal cannabis market from a thin medical marijuana law, federal raids,…