It’s no secret that the only cannabis available for official use on research is provided by the University of Mississippi and NIDA, which is notoriously low in quality. The lawsuit also states that this marijuana is unfit for research because of “poor quality, unstable supply, and limited variability that in no way emulates the types of cannabis currently available through either state-regulated markets or informal markets where regulated supply is unavailable.” What makes it worse is that this cannabis is only allowed for research and not to be sold commercially, which means that it can’t be used for Phase 3 studies of the FDA, required under the Good Manufacturing Processes.
How much should an ounce of weed cost? As the U.S. cannabis market surges past…
Find the best high-potency hemp products of 2025. Leafly reviewed popular hemp products & chose…
A breakdown of the situation regarding hemp, cannabis, and THCA—courtesy of The Hemp Doctor. The…
Well, folks, it looks like Donald Trump might be the best thing to happen to…
In a policy memo that reeks of entitlement, the American Beverage Licensees (ABL) trade association…
A surprising shift has caught the eye of analysts and regulators: a European company has…