Categories: aggregated

Is Science Inherently Biased Against Marijuana, If So, How Can We Trust the Results?

I recently stumbled on this article published on “The Hill” entitled “To Safeguard public health let science guide marijuana legalization” written by Dr. Richard S. Rosenthal. In this article, the good doctor argues that “Science should be sitting at the center of all policy decisions regarding cannabis!” of which I actually agree. But then, upon further reading, my insides started cringing as the so-called “science” that Rosenthal utilizes to solidify his point is highly fickle in nature.

Jason

Share
Published by
Jason

Recent Posts

88% of Americans Support Legal Weed: The Poll Numbers Destroying Cannabis Stigma

New aggregated polls reveal that 55% of respondents believe marijuana is not dangerous, and a…

22 hours ago

How to Maximize Cannabis Yield: 5 Croptober Myths & Proven Tactics

Every Croptober, growers waste time on folklore instead of physics. We break down the science…

2 days ago

Cannabis voter guide to the 2026 midterm elections

Leafly's 2026 cannabis voter guide for the midterms is the only plan you need to…

4 days ago

Harvest road trip 2026: Emerald Triangle genetics to watch

Come along on an Emerald Triangle road trip with Lindsay MaHarry to see some of…

5 days ago

The DEA Approved an Ayahuasca Church—Can You Start a Cannabis Religion?

This month an Iowa church got what every sacramental-plant congregation dreams about: a path to…

5 days ago

The 5 Celebrities Who Could Force Washington to Legalize Cannabis Overnight

The cannabis industry does not need another study, another tax revenue report, or another state-level…

7 days ago