But surely this should have ‘some’ impact on the global state of cannabis? Of course, the fact that the U.N shifted their stance on cannabis and removed “marijuana for medical use” from the 1961 Single Convention of Narcotic Drugs – but does this mean cannabis for recreational use is still considered part of the document. One thing I know for certain is that “language matters” when it comes to legal documents like this. If it’s only “for medical purposes” – then we know that it’s not a move for “the freedom of people” but rather to grant clemency to the medical community to research it. Who is the main participant in the medical arena?
New aggregated polls reveal that 55% of respondents believe marijuana is not dangerous, and a…
Every Croptober, growers waste time on folklore instead of physics. We break down the science…
Leafly's 2026 cannabis voter guide for the midterms is the only plan you need to…
Come along on an Emerald Triangle road trip with Lindsay MaHarry to see some of…
This month an Iowa church got what every sacramental-plant congregation dreams about: a path to…
The cannabis industry does not need another study, another tax revenue report, or another state-level…