The major issue here is that NIDA still controls most of the funding, and the implications for negatively biased cannabis studies is not something to be taken lightly. People consume the information on the internet, especially if it LOOKS to be a credible study but is not. Having people access correct information online about the health benefits of cannabis is critical to saving lives.
A point-by-point look at SAM’s New York report finds a familiar pattern: selective data, overstated…
"The War on Drugs" is a 12-track musical history project chronicling America's century-long crusade against…
My courageous struggle to stay high through the marijuana dark ages of the ‘80s and…
When I first started writing this, I thought it would be a quick explainer of…
Grenada’s reform is building regional momentum, but Bermuda’s path runs straight into a UK veto,…
The hemp boom moved fast. In the years following the 2018 Farm Bill, thousands of…